news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Dad �unfit parent for refusing son McDonald's'

Canadian Content
20790news upnews down

Dad �unfit parent for refusing son McDonald's' | New York Post


World | 207896 hits | Nov 08 3:20 pm | Posted by: N_Fiddledog
17 Comment

Attorney David Schorr slapped a court-appointed shrink with a defamation lawsuit for telling the judge deciding a custody battle with his estranged wife that he was an unfit parent � for refusing to take his son to the fast food joint for dinner.

Comments

  1. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:57 am
    You have got to be shitting, the guy probably saved his son from a life of inactivity, obesity, and an early death. He should be applauded for not poisoning his child rather than vilified by some demented femnazi lawyer who thinks parenting stops when the test tube is cleaned.

  2. by avatar andyt
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:03 am
    We already had this, I thought. As somebody pointed out tho, there may be more to the story - maybe the shrink saying the dad was not fit had a lot more to go on, that we don't hear about. Note we're only getting dad's side of this story.

    for instance:
    She recently filed motions asking the judge to punish her husband for flouting court orders and for a judgment on nonpayment of child support.


    On the face of it, of course it's nuts. If the facts are as represented here, let's hope the judge has the good sense not to be swayed by the shrink.

  3. by avatar GreenTiger
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:25 am
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    You have got to be shitting, the guy probably saved his son from a life of inactivity, obesity, and an early death. He should be applauded for not poisoning his child rather than vilified by some demented femnazi lawyer who thinks parenting stops when the test tube is cleaned.

    This is so F twisted it must be true.

  4. by avatar Public_Domain
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 6:51 am
    :|

  5. by avatar saturn_656
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:03 am
    Dad might as well argue that Mom's the unfit parent for taking him to McDonalds.

    Makes just about as much sense.

  6. by avatar PublicAnimalNo9
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:06 am
    "saturn_656" said
    Dad might as well argue that Mom's the unfit parent for taking him to McDonalds.

    Makes just about as much sense.

    Depending on the frequency of McDonald's visits, it might even make more sense :lol:

  7. by avatar GreenTiger
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:19 pm
    Refusing to take his kid to McDonalds is Politically Incorrect? Good God.

  8. by avatar Unsound
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:33 pm
    There has to be more to it. I can't see it being PC motivated. This is the kind of thing right and left would agree on, although for different reasons. With the left hating junk food and the right hating anybody interfering with parenting decisions I think we can all agree with the dad's actions in this case. Except the Mcdonald's lawyers who are, nno doubt, preparing their defamation suits as we speak.

  9. by OnTheIce
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:39 pm
    "Freakinoldguy" said
    You have got to be shitting, the guy probably saved his son from a life of inactivity, obesity, and an early death. He should be applauded for not poisoning his child rather than vilified by some demented femnazi lawyer who thinks parenting stops when the test tube is cleaned.


    A little over-the-top, no? :lol:

  10. by avatar saturn_656
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:47 pm
    "Unsound" said
    There has to be more to it. I can't see it being PC motivated. This is the kind of thing right and left would agree on, although for different reasons. With the left hating junk food and the right hating anybody interfering with parenting decisions I think we can all agree with the dad's actions in this case. Except the Mcdonald's lawyers who are, nno doubt, preparing their defamation suits as we speak.


    It's not PC motivated. It's motivated by a vindictive (soon to be ex) wife.

  11. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:01 pm
    "OnTheIce" said
    You have got to be shitting, the guy probably saved his son from a life of inactivity, obesity, and an early death. He should be applauded for not poisoning his child rather than vilified by some demented femnazi lawyer who thinks parenting stops when the test tube is cleaned.


    A little over-the-top, no? :lol:

    Yeah. That whole inactivity thing can't be blamed on Mcdonalds. XBox has more to do with that. :wink:

  12. by avatar BeaverFever
    Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:23 pm
    The headline is sensational, true to NY Post, but the story suggests to me that there is more to it. Right or wrong, my guess is the dad is being faulted for not feeding the kid at all. Maybe its true that the kid is so stubborn that it would have been impoassible to get him to eat anything else. If he had sent the kid home with take-out from the local cafe or wherever else was acceptable he might not be in hot water.

  13. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:40 pm
    The child was given a choice....children need to start learning about consequences for the choices they make, and missing one meal isn`t going to harm a child unless they are diabetic. I remember being sent to bed without supper for bad behaviour a couple times. I woke up hungry, but with a better attitude. The failure to provide child support is what I`d like to know more about.

  14. by avatar saturn_656
    Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:09 pm
    "BeaverFever" said
    The headline is sensational, true to NY Post, but the story suggests to me that there is more to it. Right or wrong, my guess is the dad is being faulted for not feeding the kid at all. Maybe its true that the kid is so stubborn that it would have been impoassible to get him to eat anything else. If he had sent the kid home with take-out from the local cafe or wherever else was acceptable he might not be in hot water.


    You never got the "eat your supper or go to bed hungry" treatment?



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net