The lawyer for a Jamaican man who held Canadians hostage last spring aboard a CanJet flight bound for Halifax told CBC News Thursday night that his client didn't feel he was doing anything wrong.
"I was expecting what the law says in a situation like this, that he did not know what he was doing at the time of the incident, he did not believe that it was illegal," Thomas said.
Not knowing that something is wrong is a defence. Not knowing something is illegal is not. The lawyer is as big an idiot as his client.
Imagine if that ever became a legal precident.
Your honour my client is not guilty because he is an idiot.
Imagine if that ever became a legal precident.
It is. Mentally challenged...
Not knowing that something is wrong is a defence. Not knowing something is illegal is not. The lawyer is as big an idiot as his client.
Your honour my client is not guilty because he is an idiot.
Imagine if that ever became a legal precident.
It is. Mentally challenged...
Idiot = Mentally challenged?
Your honour my client is not guilty because he is an idiot.
Imagine if that ever became a legal precident.
It is. Mentally challenged...
Idiot = Mentally challenged?
If you play it right? hell yes.
Your honour my client is not guilty because he is an idiot.
Imagine if that ever became a legal precident.
It is. Mentally challenged...
Idiot = Mentally challenged?
Ya no shit right?
that kind of comment in front of me...gets a fucking jaw broken