![]() Decendants of dissolved Edmonton-area First Nations continue to struggle to regain treaty rightsLaw & Order | 203026 hits | Nov 18 6:04 am | Posted by: DrCaleb Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
|
Which considering we weren�t allowed to hire lawyers until 1960�s hasn�t gone well.
One of the gifts that the Indian Act gave them. When Veterans who were promised land in return for military service wanted the land and were denied or the land was given to their Indian Agent, they hired lawyers to fight for what was promised. Instead, the government enacted that First Nations people were forbidden from hiring lawyers.
Truly second rate citizens. Disgusting to think that happened here. All the more reason for reconciliation, and treating them like equal partners.
And that, as multiple Indigenous thinkers and advocates have said from long before Confederation right up to the present day, does mean assimilating them as plain unhypenated Canadians but recognizing their land and governance rights.
As much as it might turn some peoples' stomachs, we're eventually going to have to open up the Constitution to clarify and enshrine these things. Section 35 is often criticized as Crown governments considering it an 'empty box' that has to be filled with rights, often leaving Indigenous nations without much at all.
The issue of Quebec's place in Confederation hasn't been solved yet, and neither has the issue of Indigenous peoples' place in it.