What�s New in the Latest U.S. Climate Assessment

Scientists Trash New Federal Climate Report as Tripe

"Climate expert Dr. Roger Pielke Jr.: The claim of economic damage from climate change is based on a 15 degree F temp increase that is double the "most extreme value reported elsewhere in the report." The "sole editor" of this claim in the report was an alumni of the Center for American Progress, which is also funded by Tom Styer."

Climate analyst Paul Homewood: "Cherry picks" a few bad weather events "extrapolates using the most scary scenarios"

Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels on the report: "Systematically flawed" - Report "should be shelved"

Trump v. Trump?!: Dr. Ken Haapala: 'The global warming chorus immediately seized on the new USGCRP report claiming the Trump administration is contradicting President Trump's claims about global warming. Amusingly, some of the chorus interviewed people who worked on the USGCRP, who were political appointees under the Obama Administration.'

Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore: "The science must be addressed head-on. If POTUS has his reasons for letting this Obama-era committee continue to peddle tripe I wish he would tell us what they are."

Dr. John Dunn: "Two years into the Trump administration it is sad to see this 400-page pile of crap."

The new book, The Politically Incorrect Guide To Climate Change: MIT climate scientist Richard Lindzen wrote of the National Academy of Sciences: "Regardless of evidence the answer is predetermined. If the government wants carbon control, that is the answer that the Academies will provide."

http://www.climatedepot.com/2018/11/25/ ... om-steyer/

"Climate Depot's Morano: "It is a political report masquerading as science. The media is hyping a rehash of frightening climate change claims by Obama administration holdover activist government scientists. The new report is once again pre-determined science. The National Climate Assessment report reads like a press release from environmental pressure groups - because it is! Two key authors are longtime Union of Concerned Scientist activists, Donald Wuebbles and Katharine Hayhoe."

The bots are reacting to keywords again.

It's called 'triggered'.

It's called 'triggered'.

Unless you hear a loud noise then you can rest assured that I am not triggered.

So...

Nonsense gets posted.

Nobody bothers with it.

The poster challenges people to respond on a different thread.

Somebody does.

Then it's "Wah!!! Somebody responded to my nonsense."

And the responder can only sit there going then